A Security Operations Center (SOC) exists to detect, investigate, and respond to security threats before they cause damage. To do this at scale, most SOCs follow a tiered operating model.
The goal of SOC tiers is not hierarchy for its own sake. It is flow control:
Prevent senior analysts from drowning in noise
Ensure alerts are handled quickly and consistently
Escalate only what genuinely requires deeper expertise
This tiered structure is widely adopted across enterprises, MSSPs, and managed SOC providers because it balances speed, accuracy, and cost.
Detect and qualify security alerts.
Tier 1 SOC analysts represent the first line of defence. They continuously monitor security tools and conduct initial alert triage. Tier 1 analysts collect raw data, review alarms and alerts, assess the criticality of alerts, determine whether each alert is legitimate or a false positive, and identify high-risk events. When they encounter issues they cannot resolve, they escalate incidents to Tier 2 analysts.
Additional responsibilities include:
Successful Tier 1 analysts need strong attention to detail, the ability to process large volumes of data under pressure, and excellent communication skills. They may also run vulnerability scans and configure monitoring tools. When a Tier 1 analyst determines that an alert warrants deeper investigation, they create a support ticket and hand it off to Tier 2.
Understand what is happening and how serious it is.
Tier 2 analysts take over when an alert requires deeper investigation. They validate whether an incident is real, determine scope and impact, and decide on next actions.
Tier 2 analysts typically:
Tier 2 analysts act as incident responders who review escalated tickets, assess which systems have been targeted, and direct the recovery process.
Find what automated detection misses and improve future defence.
Tier 3 analysts are the most experienced members of the SOC. They handle major incidents escalated from Tier 2 and proactively hunt for threats. Their responsibilities include handling escalated incidents, performing or supervising vulnerability assessments and penetration tests, proactively identifying potential threats and security gaps, and recommending optimisations for monitoring and detection capabilities.
Typical Tier 3 activities:
Tier 3 analysts (often referred to as threat hunters) also review vulnerability and asset data to uncover covert threats, run penetration tests, and improve security monitoring effectiveness.
| SOC Tier | Primary responsibilities | Example activities |
| Tier 1 – Triage specialist | Alert triage, event classification, false‑positive filtering, data enrichment, documentation, tool tuning | Review alarms & alerts; assess criticality; gather evidence & enrich alerts; adjust SIEM rules |
| Tier 2 – Incident responder | Incident analysis, threat intelligence correlation, containment & remediation, process improvement, mentoring | Conduct deep log and forensic analysis; evaluate scope & systems; develop custom detection rules; refine procedures and mentor Tier 1 |
| Tier 3 – Threat hunter | Advanced threat hunting, research, vulnerability assessment, penetration testing, strategic security leadership | Hunt for sophisticated threats; perform vulnerability assessments & pen tests; develop detection mechanisms & tools; design enterprise security strategies |
In a well-run SOC, tiers are not silos. They operate as a pipeline:
The output of Tier 3 improves Tier 1.
The feedback from Tier 2 sharpens escalation rules. This loop is what turns a SOC from “alert handling” into operational security.
While the three analyst tiers form the core of most SOCs, several other roles support them. A SOC Manager supervises the security operations team, providing guidance, hiring and training staff, defining processes, assessing incident reports, developing crisis communication plans, and overseeing budgets and performance.
Many organisations also employ:
When organisations consume SOC-as-a-Service, the tiered model still exists — but ownership and execution change. From a customer perspective, the key difference is this:
You consume outcomes, not tiers.
What the customer experiences:
The internal tiering happens inside the managed SOC, not inside your organisation.
Tier 1 in SOCaaS
Tier 2 in SOCaaS
Tier 3 in SOCaaS
From the customer side, this appears as a single, coherent service, not three separate teams.
SOC-as-a-Service does not remove customer responsibility — it refocuses it. Customers typically retain control over:
Everything else — monitoring, investigation, escalation discipline — is handled by the SOC provider. This model works because it aligns responsibility with capability: the provider handles security operations, tThe customer focuses on business and risk ownership.
Understanding the roles and responsibilities within a SOC is critical for building effective security operations. Tier 1 analysts triage alerts and filter noise; Tier 2 analysts perform in‑depth investigations and coordinate incident response; Tier 3 analysts hunt for advanced threats and drive security strategy. Beyond the tiered analysts, SOC managers, security engineers and other specialists contribute to a mature SOC.
For organisations lacking resources to build an in‑house SOC, SOC‑as‑a‑Service provides an attractive alternative. It delivers 24/7 monitoring, advanced threat detection and response, specialised expertise and scalable coverage through a subscription model. Yet outsourcing introduces trade‑offs around control, context and communication. Whether adopting SOCaaS or building internally, the goal remains the same: ensuring continuous visibility, rapid detection and effective response to secure your organisation’s digital assets.