Huntress Competitors and Alternatives for European Organizations

Technical review by Volodymyr Garbar, CISO & Tech Lead
Updated: 9 October 2026

Huntress competitors include Sophos, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft, and other managed detection and response providers. For European organizations, the list gets wider. WithSecure, Heimdal, Truesec, Integrity360, and Q-Sec are also worth examining, particularly when European delivery, regulatory requirements, or a broader SOC model matters.

Huntress is an interesting service to compare because it does several things buyers usually ask MDR providers to make simpler. Its Managed EDR combines endpoint technology with a 24/7 human SOC, while the wider Huntress platform now covers identity, SIEM, security awareness, and security posture management. Huntress also publishes pricing, which is still surprisingly rare in managed security.

That makes Huntress a good fit for plenty of smaller and mid-sized organizations, lean internal teams, and MSPs.

It does not make the comparison unnecessary.

European buyers still need to look at the security stack they already have, what the provider will actually operate, where data and analysts sit, how far response authority goes, and what happens when an alert turns into a regulatory incident at 2:17 on a Sunday morning.

Huntress alternatives at a glance

The table below compares Huntress with global and European alternatives across service model, technology approach, European delivery, and pricing visibility.

The useful comparison is not which company has the longest feature page. It is how much security work actually disappears from your internal team’s queue after the contract is signed.

Why organizations look for Huntress alternatives

Huntress has a fairly clear proposition.

Its Managed EDR includes endpoint protection, threat investigation, and 24/7 SOC response. Huntress can also manage Microsoft Defender Antivirus and integrate with Defender for Endpoint. The broader platform adds Managed ITDR and Managed SIEM, with the SOC included rather than sold as a separate service layer.

For a lean team, that is appealing. There are fewer moving parts and fewer people to hire.

Organizations usually start comparing alternatives when the environment gets more complicated.

Maybe the company already owns SentinelOne or CrowdStrike and does not particularly fancy replacing it. Maybe it needs network, cloud, identity, OT, or broader SIEM coverage. An MSP may need different multi-tenant economics. A regulated European organization may care much more about data location, analyst access, evidence retention, or incident-reporting workflows than a standard EDR comparison captures.

And sometimes the requirement is simply bigger than managed endpoints.

That distinction matters. Huntress can now cover substantially more than EDR, but a managed security platform, an MDR provider, and a provider operating a wider SOC are still different buying decisions.

For a broader view of those service models, see our Comparison of MDR Providers for European Organizations.

Major global Huntress competitors

Sophos MDR

Sophos is one of the more direct Huntress alternatives for smaller and mid-sized organizations.

Both companies combine security technology with a managed team rather than leaving customers with another console full of alerts. Sophos MDR can also ingest alerts from third-party security products, so an organization does not necessarily have to replace everything it already owns. Sophos documents both data-ingest and response-action integrations for supported third-party products.

Consider Sophos when you already use Sophos products, want MDR around a mixed security environment, or need a provider with a large existing MSP ecosystem.

The comparison needs to go deeper than “both have a 24/7 SOC.” Check exactly which third-party products can provide telemetry, which support response actions, and which parts of your environment remain outside that boundary.

Those are three different questions. They tend to become one question during sales calls.

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete

CrowdStrike sits at a different end of the market.

Falcon Complete Next-Gen MDR provides 24/7 expert-led detection and response across CrowdStrike’s endpoint, identity, and cloud capabilities, with third-party telemetry available through Falcon Next-Gen SIEM. CrowdStrike also describes full-cycle remediation as part of the service.

For an organization already committed to Falcon, this can be a very sensible shortlist candidate. Adding another endpoint-centered security platform simply to obtain managed operations can create more architecture than security.

Consider CrowdStrike when Falcon is already strategic to your security stack, you need broader enterprise coverage, or platform consolidation is a priority.

The trade-off is the same one that comes with most large platform ecosystems: understand which capabilities depend on additional Falcon products and how much of your non-CrowdStrike environment actually falls inside the managed service.

SentinelOne Wayfinder MDR

SentinelOne Wayfinder MDR is another natural Huntress competitor for organizations that want endpoint and XDR technology tied closely to the managed service.

SentinelOne describes Wayfinder MDR as providing 24/7 detection, investigation, response, and continuous monitoring, with proactive threat hunting and Google Threat Intelligence included in its current service model.

Consider SentinelOne when you already run Singularity, are considering SentinelOne for endpoint/XDR, or want the MDR service close to the underlying security platform.

For mixed environments, look carefully at telemetry coverage and integrations. A beautiful XDR diagram is less beautiful when one of your important systems lives outside it.

European Huntress alternatives worth adding to the shortlist

WithSecure, Heimdal, Truesec, Integrity360, and Q-Sec are European Huntress alternatives worth considering. They offer different combinations of MDR, managed SOC, incident response, and broader security operations.

WithSecure

Finland-based WithSecure offers several managed security models rather than one fixed MDR package.

Its current Co-Security portfolio includes 24/7 MDR as well as Elements Infinite. The latter combines continuous exposure management, MDR, and incident-response support into a more complete managed service. WithSecure states that its Detection and Response Team monitors customer environments around the clock.

WithSecure also documents a particularly clear European position: customer data can remain in Europe, with European Detection and Response teams monitoring the environment.

Consider WithSecure when European service delivery and data handling are important, and you are comfortable using the WithSecure Elements ecosystem.

This is not a direct Huntress clone. That is partly the point. Organizations looking beyond straightforward managed EDR may prefer the wider exposure-management and incident-readiness model.

Heimdal MXDR

Heimdal is another European-origin alternative that deserves more attention than it usually gets in Huntress comparison pages.

Its Managed XDR service combines a 24/7 SOC with monitoring, investigation, threat hunting, vulnerability management, and response across the Heimdal security platform. The service covers more than endpoint detection, including network, email, cloud, identity, and other security areas.

Heimdal’s model leans heavily toward security consolidation. That can be attractive if the existing stack has slowly turned into a collection of tools acquired by five different people over six years.

Consider Heimdal when you want managed detection and response but also want to reduce the number of separate security products being operated.

That same strength creates the obvious diligence question: how much of the value depends on adopting the wider Heimdal platform? If keeping existing tools is a hard requirement, get that answer before comparing quotes.

Truesec

Sweden-based Truesec approaches the problem more like a security operations and incident-response company.

Its MDR service provides 24/7 monitoring across networks, endpoints, logs, and cloud environments. Truesec also offers different MDR levels, including an MDR Core service aimed at small and mid-sized organizations and broader enterprise coverage. Its current material places incident-response capability close to the MDR service rather than treating it as an unrelated department.

For larger environments, Truesec also describes its MDR Enterprise service as vendor-agnostic.

Consider Truesec when you want European/Nordic SOC delivery, broader monitoring than endpoints alone, and a provider with substantial incident-response capability.

That makes the comparison with Huntress interesting. Huntress is deliberately simple. Truesec can make more sense when simplicity is no longer enough.

Integrity360

Ireland-based Integrity360 provides Aegis MDR as part of a wider managed cybersecurity portfolio.

Aegis MDR covers networks, endpoints, and on-premise and hybrid cloud environments, with response and containment included in the service positioning.

This makes Integrity360 relevant when the requirement extends beyond an endpoint-focused managed service and the buyer expects to need other security services around it.

Consider Integrity360 when you want a European-managed security partner and expect MDR to sit inside a wider security program.

The usual warning applies: compare the contracted MDR scope, not the size of the provider’s services menu. A capability existing somewhere inside a company does not automatically mean it exists inside your contract.

Q-Sec

Q-Sec takes a different route from Huntress.

Instead of asking the customer to build its security operations around one proprietary endpoint platform, Q-Sec’s managed security model can connect existing endpoint, cloud, network, SIEM, and other security sources into 24/7 operations.

That matters when the company already owns decent security technology and the missing piece is people who will actually watch it, investigate what happens, respond, and leave behind usable evidence.

Q-Sec’s SOC-as-a-Service provides continuous monitoring, triage, response, incident tracking, and reporting. Its service is aimed particularly at European organizations operating under requirements such as NIS2, DORA, and GDPR.

Consider Q-Sec when you want to keep existing security investments, need broader SOC operations rather than another endpoint product, or need security operations and regulatory evidence to work together.

Huntress can still be the cleaner choice for a small team that wants managed EDR with predictable per-endpoint pricing. Q-Sec becomes more relevant when the environment and operational responsibilities are harder to squeeze into a standard product package.

A comparison that pretends every company needs the same thing is not much of a comparison.

Huntress pricing: one of its strongest arguments

Huntress is unusually transparent about pricing. Its current pricing page lists Managed EDR from $5.99 to $8.99 per endpoint per month, depending on volume, with the 24/7 SOC included.

At the time of writing, direct-customer pricing includes:

Huntress states that its 24/7 SOC is included in these prices. Direct purchases have a 50-unit minimum per product, standard contracts run for 12 months, and pricing falls as committed volume increases. Partner pricing for MSPs and resellers is separate and is not publicly listed.

That is genuinely useful pricing transparency.

It still does not make a Huntress quote directly comparable with every MDR quote.

A provider charging per endpoint, another charging per user, and another operating your existing SIEM for a fixed monthly service fee may all be selling something described as “24/7 managed detection and response.” The work inside those contracts can be quite different.

Before comparing totals, check:

This is where a cheap endpoint price can become a slightly more creative spreadsheet.

Free guide

Need a European pricing benchmark?

Our Cybersecurity Pricing in Europe guide compares MDR, managed SOC, and SIEM pricing models and the operational costs that often sit outside the headline quote.

Get the Cybersecurity Pricing in Europe guide

Huntress alternatives for MSPs need a slightly different comparison

MSPs are one of Huntress’s natural audiences, so a provider comparison for them cannot use exactly the same checklist as an internal security team.

Huntress is channel-first and publishes separate partner pricing for MSPs and resellers. Its products are managed by the Huntress SOC, while partners can take responsibility for deployment, integration, portal operations, and the customer relationship.

An MSP evaluating Huntress alternatives should therefore check more than detection quality.

Multi-tenant administration matters. So does customer separation, delegated access, licensing flexibility, minimum commitments, reporting, API access, white-label options where relevant, and who talks to the end customer during a serious incident.

There is also a fairly basic commercial question: does the provider help the MSP deliver security, or slowly turn itself into the MSP’s competitor?

That question deserves an answer before the partnership agreement does.

Does a European MDR provider matter for NIS2?

Not automatically. A company being headquartered in Europe does not make its MDR service better, and it certainly does not make the customer compliant.

What European organizations do need is clarity about how the service operates.

NIS2 Article 21 requires essential and important entities to take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational, and organizational cybersecurity measures. These include incident handling, business continuity, supply-chain security, vulnerability handling, and procedures for assessing whether security measures are effective. It specifically includes security aspects of relationships with direct suppliers and service providers.

The Directive goes further than treating managed security providers as ordinary software suppliers. Its recitals explicitly note the close operational access of managed security service providers and call for increased diligence when selecting them.

So when a Huntress alternative will sit inside your incident-detection and response process, ask some boring questions. Boring is excellent during procurement.

• Where is security data stored and processed?
• Where can analysts access it from?
• Which subprocessors participate in the service?
• Which systems and telemetry sources are actually monitored?
• What can analysts contain without waiting for approval?
• What happens outside business hours?
• Which incident records and evidence can you export?
• How long is that evidence retained?
• How does a serious security event reach the person responsible for regulatory reporting?
• What data and investigation history can you take with you when the contract ends?

None of those requirements says “buy European.”

They do make vague answers such as “we support NIS2” considerably less impressive.

For the regulatory side of the service boundary, see our MDR for NIS2 guide.

Which Huntress alternative fits which type of organization?

Huntress remains a strong candidate for lean teams and MSPs that want managed endpoint and identity security with a straightforward commercial model.

Sophos deserves consideration when the organization already uses its security ecosystem or wants MDR that can consume supported third-party data.

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete makes more sense when Falcon is already strategic and the organization wants deeper enterprise platform consolidation.

SentinelOne Wayfinder MDR is a natural comparison for teams building around Singularity.

WithSecure gives European organizations a Europe-centered managed model and a wider option through Elements Infinite.

Heimdal becomes interesting when tool consolidation is part of the project, not just MDR.

Truesec is worth examining when broader SOC coverage and incident-response depth matter.

Integrity360 fits a shortlist where MDR will probably become part of a wider managed security relationship.

Q-Sec is relevant when the organization wants to keep its existing stack and connect 24/7 security operations more closely with European regulatory and evidence requirements.

The shortlist gets much shorter once you define what the provider is actually expected to own.

FAQ

Who are Huntress’s main competitors?

Huntress competitors include Sophos, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft, and other managed security providers. European buyers can also investigate WithSecure, Heimdal, Truesec, Integrity360, and Q-Sec depending on stack, service scope, and regional requirements.

What are the main European alternatives to Huntress?

European Huntress alternatives include WithSecure, Heimdal, Truesec, Integrity360, and Q-Sec. They differ significantly in technology ownership, SOC delivery, incident response, integrations, and the extent to which they can operate an existing security stack.

How much does Huntress Managed EDR cost?

Huntress currently lists Managed EDR at $8.99 per endpoint per month for 50–99 endpoints and $7.99 at 100 endpoints. The price includes its 24/7 SOC. Higher volumes receive lower per-unit pricing.

Is Huntress an MDR provider?

Huntress provides managed detection and response capabilities through services including Managed EDR, Managed ITDR, and Managed SIEM, all backed by its 24/7 SOC. Its service model is more productized than many traditional MDR or managed SOC providers.

What are good Huntress alternatives for MSPs?

Sophos, SentinelOne, Heimdal, and other channel-oriented security providers can be considered alongside Huntress. MSPs should compare partner economics, multi-tenancy, licensing, integrations, customer ownership, reporting, response responsibilities, and escalation rather than endpoint features alone.

Is Huntress suitable for NIS2?

Huntress can provide monitoring, investigation, response, and security evidence that may support parts of a NIS2 program. NIS2 does not require Huntress, MDR, or any named security product, and the regulated organization retains its own responsibilities.

Should European organizations choose a European MDR provider?

Not solely because it is European. Data location, analyst access, subprocessors, response authority, evidence, incident handling, and contract terms are more useful criteria. European delivery can make some of these requirements easier to address, but it still needs verification.